|
WHEN IT COMES TO CHEAPLY PRICED, HIGH QUALITY DVD UPCONVERTERS, SAMSUNG IS HARD TO BEAT.AND SO IS THIS ONE.
The picture quality is great. It was easy to hook up with the HDMI cable that came with the product. I have had this DVD player for almost a year. I have been very happy with its performance. The only negative would be the small display.
I've since replaced it with a less expensive Panasonic unit that puts it to shame. The loading device would freeze occasionally, the volume would sometimes inexplicably cut-off, and it delivered very noisy HD. I usually have decent luck with buying equipment - not this time. This Samsung unit was unreliable and is inferior to others in or below its price range. Consider other units before this one.
This means that it takes less time for your DVD player to read an odd/even pair of 240-line interaced fields (it does this every 1/30th of a second) than it does for the film frame to change. The most highly rated upscaling player in terms of picture quality (Oppo) does not have the EZ-View feature (I *really* like this feature because my LCD TV does not do perfect blacks. DVDs made from a film source take advantage of this fact and store a single "progressive" 480-line film frame as two interlaced 240-line fields. The Panasonic S97S does have the equivalent of EZ-View, but is notably more expensive and does not come with cables (making it even more expensive in the end).
There is no way in the MPEG-2 scheme used by DVD players that you can store a single image of 480 *consecutive* lines. The DVDs have a special flag that tells the DVD player not to use the normal de-interlacing scheme it would use for standard NTSC 480i video. This means that the deinterlacing technology has to try and compensate for this. In short: "Aleksey" and "Count" basically are both right.The long answer: All DVDs for the North America market store "fields" with 240 lines each.
That decision is really for you to make. The DVD-HD950 is a higher-end version of the DVD-HD850 in that it does DVD-Audio and SACD and comes with HDMI/DVI cables.Your mileage as far as the upscaling/deinterlacing quality will vary depending on how well you TV does this. But then, can you really tell the difference and is it worth the extra money or loss of features. This is a very difficult task and is the reason deinterlacing technology is such a big deal. HOWEVER, film sources only have a new frame every 1/24th second. For example, if I am watching a tennis ball fly across the screen on my local TV broadcast, then the position of that ball actually changes every 1/60th second. The odd and even interlaced fields are not part of the exact same image.
interlaced in the actual DVD encoding.
Instead, when it sees this flag your DVD player reads an odd/even pair of interlaced fields, and then weaves them together to construct a single perfectly progressive movie frame.The hard part about deinterlacing a standard NTSC 480i stream is that the image actually changes between each 240-line field.
I tend to agree with most of what has been said about this DVD player.
Furthermore, keep in mind that which mode looks the best may also depend on the movie itself and how it was encoded.Speaking of encoding, I *have* to chime in here regarding the confusion of progressive vs.
It's pretty decent, although probably not as good as of a picture as some others out there (Panasonic, Oppo) in the same price category.
Some TVs come do with better technology than most upscaling DVD players, so you should try the player in all modes and see which one looks the best.
Different things are important for different people.The DVD-HD950 does give you a lot of features for the price.
Blacks bars on 2.39:1 movies are OK, but grey-ish black bars stink).
This is in contrast to a film source, where your DVD player performs almost no work at all to reconstruct a perfect progressive image.For more on this topic, I suggest reading sections 1.40 and 3.8 of the "Jim Taylor's Official DVD FAQ" availible online.
I also did not like the fold down door of the carriage, where last years model is stationary.I just see that as a moving part doomed to break eventually. I have it temporarily connected with component cables, but must warn you to read the manual carefully if you set up yours similarily, as you get a red picture when you first turn on a DVD.
With the price being the same for either I saw it as a no brainer to go with last years model for the perceived quality of the case alone since there was no lost features. So unless you have to have black unit to match you setup go for the 850 while it's still available.Both players have decent features the 850 looks fantastic on my Samsung LCD.
Just bought new Samsung LCD and decided on up conversion DVD player. It seems the unit comes set to accept composit or an S- jack so you have to use the remote to change the settings.I'm told not an issue if you use the HDMI connection.
Went to Best Buy and they had on display both models. The foot print of the HD950 is smaller, appears to have same features but has a "cheap" black plastic case.
The Remote is Ok, but not as well laid out as my old Panasonic.
|
