|
i like the turntable, i went out bought a cartridge for it and the sound is great, i wish the tone arm was a little bit heavier and made out of better material but i cant really complain. you really get a great product for what you pay for, and for vinyl heads and new beginner dj, this is a great product at a great price.
On any other DJ deck I know of, doing this will have the desired effect, but on the TT-200 the motor may speed the record up. Numark, hire some turntable experts from the 1970's (they're still around) and let them have at your turntable lineup. The only reason they've gravitated to this strait arm option is because their S-arms do not track as well as gimbal tone arms from other companies. The Average Wow & Flutter is rated at better than 0.2%, but that is right at the margin of what is audible.
Remember, this is the same tone arm base they use on all their tables. The bearings system they use simply is not sound. The last item I can't stand on ALL Numark decks (not just the TT-200) is the tone arm design. So let's say the record is indeed going too fast.
You're going to find it very difficult to learn by ear when a record is too fast or too slow if the deck is constantly giving you incorrect feedback. There is no rating for Peak W&F, and from the slightly smeared highs on every cart you try (except for the harshest and brightest ones) I'd guess it's much worse than 0.2%. Already one of my TT-200's tone arm bearings system has outright failed and needed to be replaced. Numark use to make great analog mixers; still do if you can find them. Hypothetically you should be able to switch to Butter Rugs to solve this problem, but then you run into the dilemma of the tone arm being too high.
Nope. They also contributed to the development of the DJ CD player. I don't like that the tone arm is so high up that if you use a low profile cart with the strait arm that the needle won't touch the record without that thick neoprene mat. That's because it works.
You lower the pitch slightly, then you use your hand to slow the record momentarily even more for just a split second. That's right. Their company is one of innovation and advancement in the field of DJing products, but they have seriously got to revamp their turntable designs. There's a reason why EVERY other turntable manufacturer in the DJ world (with the exception of Vestax's new self-adjusting model) use the tried and tested gimbal tone arm system. I don't like how the power supply creates so much interference that Stanton 680 and Grado DJ200i will pick up EM hum from it. This has the effect of making you think the record must have instead been going too slow and that you were wrong, because now the tracks are even worse. I've never managed to get any Numark table's tracking distortion down low enough to get Stanton or Grado carts from either skipping too much or distorting in the highs asymmetrically.
My TT-200's have been such an enormous hassle to own. I've heard some people tell me this will make them a better mix DJ. About the only way it could possibly help you in learning is by forcing you to eventually mix exclusively using the pitch slider, but that assumes you ever figure out why you've been having such a hard time. Another telling factor is that Numark admitted to me they've never even tested for tracking distortion specs on their tables. That's about it. Incredible. Oh, and it's pretty.
But you weren't wrong, rather the turntable's motor is the problem. How much. I have no idea and I'd bet money that Numark doesn't know either.I absolutely despise how when you try and slow down the record using friction the TT-200's motor can actually overcompensate and speed the record up. I can guarantee you can't do any worse than you've been doing in this department.
it plays 78 speed. Phooey. the price was right and b). Ten months later I noticed that my records seemed to skip a lot. Numark replaced the parts that went bad and shipped it back quickly. Less than two years old and two parts had already gone wrong. I have only good things to say about their customer service.
It got so bad that the turntable couldn't even track some records at all. It seemed solidly built and performed very well, with excellent tone. I tried replacing the stylus (with a quality Grado one, BTW) and made sure the tracking weight and anti-skating were properly adjusted. My local audiophile repair shop confirmed that the tonearm pivot assembly had gone bad, and was not pivoting freely - that it was causing the tonearm to not move with the records' grooves.At this point, I had had enough with this machine. No dice. I called Numark and they were cool about taking it back for repair at no charge. I bought a TT-200 about 2 years ago because a).
And it looked pretty sharp, too.About a month after the warranty expired, the turntable motor went bad, and the table would not spin at the correct speed. I also paid an additional $30 or so for the optional S-shaped tone arm and pilot light. The fact that it has a universal headshell made it easy to switch between my microgroove cartridge and 78 cartridge, which are mounted on their own headshells.At first I loved this turntable. I am expecting delivery of an Audio-Technica AT-PL120 today, which will hopefully last a bit longer than the Numark.
just the thing to play my old 78s, and its got enough torque to make cleaning the dirty little buggers easy too.
The reverse is a nice little touch. What I really enjoy is the tonearm setup, which allows either an S-shaped or straight tonearm to be fitted. As far as price performance goes, this table beats everything I've played with. The only qualms I have are that, while it can use an S-shaped tonearm and a target light, these need to be bought separately. Also, the "slipmat" that comes with the tables is more rubber and less "slip", so it'll have to be replaced (at least, if I start scratching). This puppy has the strength of a 1200 or 1210, but with more features. Of course, considering I didn't have to drop $400 apiece on the tables themsleves, forking over for the extras hurts much less.
|