|
The remote is sort of a frill and a bonus at this point. Just got this tuner. While there's no tuning strength meter, once you are on the exact frequency two different red indicators appear: Stereo, Tuned.P.P.S. This exactly fits my needs.Storing channels is a piece of cake.
If you want to rack mount it, I think there's rack mount ears available separately for it. I decided I wanted a * good * (dammit) but affordable tuner.
Beats the tar out of my (admittely low priced) Pioneer receiver's tuner. It may be that I come to rely on it.
Tuner has a sleep mode, hmmm could be useful for some. Oddly enough I still like to tape certain shows off FM radio.
I have owned nice equipment before (ex: Cambridge Audio). Very simple setup.
Very clear sound - but not harsh. Either that or you can buy one of those Middle Atlantic rack trays and take the feet off the unit, vecro the bottom of it to the tray - it works.
I'm actually shocked about some of the "audiophile" features included without fanfare (gold plated RCA jacks for example) along with extensive programing and preset options THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO. This unit is the functional equivalent of my NAD, has great reception, and appears to be built like a tank. The tuner has a clock and built in timer system and can store 30 AM and 30 FM stations to memory if you want to get real geeky about it. I recently had to have a minor repair on my NAD 4155ST which I bought for about $400 at least 15 years ago. I've stopped looking. It also incudes a functional remote. Figuring it would give up the ghost sooner or later I went looking for a replacement.what a shock.tuners are few and far between now, so when I spotted the TEAC at less than $200 I figured at the very least it would serve as a stopgap until I could find something more appropriate. An excellent tuner.highly recommended.
The packing makes it suspended in the box away from all sides so there's little chance for anything to dent/damage the chassis during shipping. I had a tech question about the r670 tuner before buying it and was able to reach "Jimmy" from their consumer audio group who was very helpful and knew exactly what I was talking about with respect to my specific tech question (re: RDS function on this tuner). Seriously, my first experience with TEAC was great. I got it up and running and while I was skeptical that "a tuner is a tuner", this thing was impressive. While it may be technically superior (just a guess based on price) I wouldnt go near it for what it costs (look it up.it ain't cheap).The only thing missing from the TEAC r670 (IMHO), is a singal strength meter. The instructions are clear and there are supporting pictures for setting the clock, timers, presets etc.Unlike the Denon TU1500 that I was considering, this TEAC comes with a remote. and TEAC seems to be on par with these players.
Sure, radio technology is quite mature but most people are used to car radio, handheld radio or radios integrated into their receivers. Sure, it's not super hi-fi, but it's still worlds above the basic junk out there. For radio, it's darn good.Also, the manual that comes with it is.hold your breath again.printed on nice glossy, card-stock 8.5 x 11 paper written in perfect english. What a difference a dedicated component makes. Oh, and perhaps to have the technical manual available in PDF on their website. Such a pleasure to deal with.Now for the tuner itself. That would be a nice addition.
First, right out the box, the tuner felt substantial. What a concept. Only a few consumer level companies make higher level components these days (Pioneer Elite, Onkyo Integra, etc). It's not CD/SACD/Vinyl audio quality but what can you expect. Also, the Denon looks/feels like a $79, plastic component. No flimsy untra-thin copier paper here.
Of course, hooking up a tuner is very easy.antenna tuning/placement aside. The Denon does not come with one.how strange.
First about TEAC.the company. Solid face plate, simple design, nice buttons etc.,.
Can you belive that there are actual people at TEAC who.hold your breath.actually pick up the phone and talk to customers. Once again, they're not Krells or Mark Levinson's but still pretty good.
It's rare these days to deal with a company who doesnt seemingly outsource customer service straight away. While I am new to component tuners, I still appreciate good gear being an Adcom system owner for years.
Aside from that, this unit is top class and sits well in a system full of dedicated components (amp, DAC, CD transport etc).It's so nice to take a break from CDs and Vinyl and listen to hassle-free music.
The trend towards home theater has really hit the stereo component market, pretty much killing the low and middle end sections of it (the high end audio market is still going strong, with plenty of tuners in the $500+ range available).That's what makes the Teac TR-670 interesting. But for those in urban/suburban and even ex-urban areas, who have component systems and are looking to add or update a tuner, this is a small investment in happiness - for the fun involved in hearing all the new or forgotten music that's still on the airwaves. First, the tuner allows the use to pre-set 60 stations (30 in both the AM and FM bands), and is also capable of doing auto pre-set tuning, where the tuner scans either the entire AM or FM band, automatically adding the strongest 30 stations on each to the pre-set memory. It also comes with a remote, which really changes the nature of listening (think about how the addition of the TV remote changed the way we all watch TV, and you'll understand what I mean). A low cost component aimed at the universe of music lovers who (a) don't own $5,000 level systems but (b) have a reasonably decent component stereo system and view it primarly as a music, not theater audio source.The good news beyond price. One other note: the TEAC cassette deck I purchased back in 1984 is still going strong (yep, I pull out old tapes now and then, the cassette format isn't dead yet), so I have the sense this company builds equipment that stands up.
And for those who want to literally curl up on the sofa and fall asleep (or wake up) to the sound of music, the built in clock on the tuner even has timer and sleep functions. Sensitivity (the ability of a tuner to pick up distant, weaker signals) is also surprisingly good; I was happily surprised to actually capture strong signals from some stations in Stamford, CT (a good 100 miles away) that I'd previously never heard. Both the tuner itself and the remote allow you to tune a number of ways, including "direct access" (where you punch in the numbers for the station you want, ergo "103.9"), or scanning through the pre-sets, or general scanning. Now, anyones' experience with a particular tuner depends, to a large extent, on the reception conditions in their particular area, as well as their antenna setup (I use an outdoor, three-element FM rooftop antenna, the signals it captures are sent to the tuner through a 75 ohm coaxial cable.
Yeah, putting it up was somewhat involved, but for those who really want the best possible signal for an FM radio, this is the way to go). Or stated another way, the best audio equipment on earth isn't going to get you good FM stereo if you live in the middle of nowhere, hundreds of miles from strong signals (those in that sort of situation really need to look into satellite radio). Per comments in the other review on this tuner, no, the tuner market hasn't disappeared, it's just fragmemented. Like the previous reviewer, I also appreciated all the programming and utility features of this tuner, which are numerous.
Selectivity (the ability of a tuner to pick up a specific station without other nearby channels crowding into it) is darn good for a "cheap" tuner, and that's given the acid test I gave this in a suburb of New York where the FM band is crammed. Overload rejection and image rejection were also good, another important consideration for a listener like me who lives close to some stations' transmitters (poorly designed tuners run into problems with these stations, with the latter crowding out all the other nearby signals). Not that wear and tear is an issue here; outside a few switches, a tuner like this has no moving parts (the things that inevitably wear out), but still, my prior positive experience with TEAC is a significant part of the reason I purchased this tuner.
The one thing that really surprised me was the *size*. These all function, although the "seek" tuning is kind of irritating. This thing, while standard width, is HUGE. Hooking it up is simple as could be - one line output, and some antenna connectors.
There's a reason they only play oldies and conservative talk. It's a good 3" high. i guess the idea of a separate component tuner has become a little passe' (when I went to Circuit City they had NO IDEA what I was talking about "no, not a receiver, a TUNER. For AM, of course, there's nothing to say, fidelity-wise.
AM is much better than the Tivoli. It comes with an AM loop antenna and a typical 300-ohm "T" antenna and a convertor to 75-ohm coax. AM and FM reception are both pretty decent, although FM is not nearly as good as my Tivoli Model Two radio. And yes, I know you can get a tuner AND amplifier in the same box"), but that's what I needed, and it works. The unit looks very nice with blackened brushed aluminum faceplate, and an electroluminescent display. My dad's Heathkit was smaller, and at least they had an excuse - because 12ax7 tubes were 2" tall. I fit it in my rack OK, but I was taken aback by the size, as the tuner it replaced was about 1" high.
There's really not much chance that the limitiation in the system is the equipment - FM radio transmission is a weak point, and as long as you can accurately tune the station, it's probably going to sound the same no matter what tuner you get.
Given that more features get stuffed into car radios, I simply can't fathom the need for the super-giant box.
My old tuner recently gave up the ghost, so I got the Teac R670.
Near as I can tell, the tuner sounds fine.
Can't argue with the price, and it works pretty well.
This seems to me more than adequate if it's in a good spot.
All the modern conveniences are here - digital tuning, auto presets, etc.
I'd be fine with a good, old-fashioned knob.
For $117 it's pretty hard to argue with.
|